Asthma and pregnancy.

Managing asthma during pregnancy is crucial for both the mother and the developing child. Adequate control lowers risks as do continuation of prescribed medication and maintaining of regular check-ups. Signs of deterioration should not be ignored and treating asthma during pregnancy should follow guidelines for non-pregnant women with asthma as described in this review. Effective medication and counseling are essential for a safe pregnancy, emphasizing that well-controlled asthma is key.

In severe eosinophilic asthma controlled with benralizumab, tapering high-dose ICS reduced dose while maintaining control.

SOURCE CITATION: Jackson DJ, Heaney LG, Humbert M, et al; SHAMAL Investigators. Reduction of daily maintenance inhaled corticosteroids in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with benralizumab (SHAMAL): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 4 study. Lancet. 2024;403:271-281. 38071986.

[Dupilumab : a new treatment for severe T2 high asthma]. / Dupilumab, Dupixent® :un nouveau traitement pour l'asthme sévère avec un profil «T2 high¼.

Severe asthma often features a T2 high profile regulated by cytokines such as interleukins IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13. Dupilumab (Dupixent®) is humanized monoclonal antibody directed against the α subunit of the receptor for IL-4 and IL-13. Here we summarise the immunogical background of severe asthma which supports the use of dupilumab and the pivotal randomised controlled trials which have established the efficacy of dupilumab in treating people with severe asthma. Dupilumab reduces the exacerbation rate, has corticosteroids sparing effect, provides sustained improvement in expiratory flow rates and improved asthma control and quality of life with a reassuring safety profile. Dupilumab reduces the levels of FeNO values and of serum IgE but not those of circulating eosinophils. We also report on a few real life data with dupilumab supporting its clinical effectiveness.

L'asthme sévère est souvent caractérisé par un profil immunologique dit «T2 high¼ régulé par des cytokines telles que les interleukines IL-4, IL-5 et IL-13. Le dupilumab (Dupixent®) est un anticorps monoclonal humanisé dirigé contre la sous-unité α du récepteur à l'IL-4 et à l'IL-13. Nous présentons ici les bases immunologiques qui annoncent son efficacité dans le traitement de l'asthme sévère et les grandes études contrôlées qui ont validé son efficacité. Le dupilumab réduit la fréquence des exacerbations, permet une épargne en corticoïdes systémiques, améliore les débits expiratoires, le contrôle de la maladie et la qualité de vie des personnes asthmatiques, sans donner lieu à des effets secondaires notables. Il réduit le taux de FeNO et des IgE sériques, mais pas celui des éosinophiles circulants. Nous donnons également un aperçu de quelques données obtenues en vie réelle pour souligner son utilité en clinique.

Asthma medication adherence, control, and psychological symptoms: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Nonadherence to therapies and psychological disorders are associated with poor asthma control. This study aims to assess the prevalence of anxiety and depressive symptoms, asthma control, and adherence to inhalers and to investigate whether there is an association of anxiety and depressive symptoms with adherence to inhalers and asthma control. METHODS: We measured anxiety and depressive symptoms using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in patients with asthma. Asthma Control Test and the 10-Item Test of Adherence to Inhalers Scale were used to assess levels of asthma control adherence to inhalers, respectively. Univariate and multivariate regression models assessed the associations of anxiety and depressive symptoms with adherence to inhalers and asthma control. RESULTS: A total of 287 patients completed the study, of whom 72% were female. The mean ± SD age and body mass index of our study population were 44 ± 13 years and 29 ± 7.2 kg/m2, respectively. Poor adherence to inhaler use was highly prevalent (49.8%; 95% CI: 43.8 to 55.7). The prevalence of anxiety, depression and poor asthma control was 27.2% (95% CI: 22.1 to 32.7), 20.9% (95% CI: 16.3 to 26.1), and 22.7% (95% CI: 17.9 to 27.9), respectively. We found a negative relationship between asthma control and anxiety, and depressive symptoms (adjusted ß: -0.25; 95% CI: -0.36 to -0.14; p < 0.001 and adjusted ß: -0.29; 95% CI: -0.40 to -0.18; p < 0.001, respectively). A negative relationship was also observed between adherence to inhalers and anxiety and depressive symptoms (adjusted ß: -0.34; 95% CI: -0.46 to -0.22; p < 0.001 and adjusted ß: -0.36; 95% CI: - 0.48 to - 0.24; p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of uncontrolled asthma symptoms and poor adherence to inhalers and their impact on anxiety and depression levels among patients with asthma point to the need for early screening for psychological symptoms and recognition of nonadherence as part of asthma assessment and management plan in primary care in Saudi Arabia to avoid further worsening of asthma symptoms. Further studies are needed to explore the effectiveness of specific psychoeducational interventions and investigate the long-term impact of early psychological symptom detection on asthma outcomes.

Long-term multicenter comparison shows equivalent efficacy of monoclonal antibodies in severe asthma therapy.

BACKGROUND: Monoclonal antibodies (biologics) drastically changed severe asthma therapy. Mepolizumab (anti-interleukin (IL) 5), benralizumab (anti-IL5 receptor alpha), and dupilumab (anti-IL4/13) are the most used biologics in this context. While all biologics are efficient individually, the choice of biologic is complicated by insufficient data on their comparative long-term treatment efficacy. Here, we compare the real-life efficacy of these biologics in asthma therapy over 12 months. METHODS: 280 severe asthma patients treated with mepolizumab (129/280, 46%), benralizumab (83/280, 30%) or dupilumab (68/280, 24%) for one year were analyzed retrospectively. Data were collected at baseline and after 6 and 12 months of therapy. Endpoints were changes pulmonary function (PF), exacerbation rate, oral corticosteroid (OCS) use and dose, asthma control test (ACT) score and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels as well as responder status measured by the recently published "Biologic Asthma Response Score" (BARS). RESULTS: All biologics led to significant improvements in PF, ACT and OCS dose. Only Mepolizumab and Benralizumab significantly decreased the exacerbation rate, while only Mepolizumab and Dupilumab significantly decreased FeNO. Responder rates measured by BARS were high across all groups: roughly half of all patients achieved full response and most of the remainder achieved at least partial responder status. Overall, outcomes were similar between groups after both 6 and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: All biologics showed great efficacy in individual parameters and high responder rates measured by BARS without a clinically relevant advantage for any antibody. Response was usually achieved after 6 months and retained at 12 months, emphasizing the utility of early response assessment.

Severe Asthma or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Eosinophilic Inflammation? From Uncertainty to Remission under Anti IL-5R Therapy.

Background and Objectives: Severe adult-onset eosinophilic asthma and COPD with eosinophilic inflammation are two entities with a similar clinical course and are sometimes difficult to differentiate in clinical practice, especially in patients with a history of smoking. Anti-IL-5 or -IL-5R biological therapy has been shown to be highly effective in severe eosinophilic asthma but has not demonstrated significant benefit in patients with COPD with the eosinophilic phenotype. Our aim was to illustrate this issue in the form of a case report. Materials and Methods: We present the case of a 67-year-old patient who is a former smoker with late-onset severe uncontrolled asthma (ACT score < 15) who experienced frequent exacerbations requiring treatment with systemic corticosteroids. The patient's lung function gradually worsened to a nadir FEV1 = 18%, despite a high dose of ICS in combination with a LABA and intermittent courses of OCS, with negative allergic skin-tests, but with high blood eosinophils level. Biological treatment with an anti-IL5R monoclonal antibody (benralizumab) was initiated, despite the difficulty in the differential diagnosis between asthma and COPD with eosinophilic inflammation. Results: The patient's evolution was favorable; clinical remission was effectively achieved with significant improvement in lung function (FEV1 > 100%), but with persistence of residual mild fixed airway obstructive dysfunction (FEV1/FVC < 0.7). The therapeutic response has been maintained to date. Conclusions: Benralizumab was shown to be very effective in a patient with late-onset severe eosinophilic asthma presenting features of chronic obstructive disease-habitual exposure to tobacco and inhaled noxious substances, and persistent airflow limitation on spirometry.

[IS INHALED CORTICOSTEROID STEP-DOWN RECOMMENDED FOR ADULT ASTHMA PATIENTS HAVE BEEN WELL CONTROLLED OVER THE LONG TERM WITH MODERATE OR HIGH-DOSE INHALED CORTICOSTEROIDS?]

We conducted a systematic review to examine whether step-down of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) is recommended for adult patients with asthma have been well controlled with moderate or high-dose inhaled corticosteroids for more than 12 weeks. Seven randomized controlled trials were included. ICS step-down did not increase asthma exacerbations requiring systemic steroid therapy and hospitalization. There was no effect on respiratory function, asthma control, or QOL. No significant differences were observed in serious adverse events or steroid-related adverse events, but the observation period was insufficient to assess long-term effects. Based on these results, we weakly recommend ICS step-down in adult patients with asthma have been well controlled with moderate or high-dose inhaled corticosteroids, but long-term asthma control and the incidence of steroid-related adverse events should be further investigated in the future.

Real-life experience after 3 months with tezepelumab before marketing approval.

BACKGROUND: Tezepelumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), implicated in asthma pathogenesis, and that has been approved for patients with severe uncontrolled asthma in Spain in October 2023. This study evaluates our experience with Tezepelumab for those patients who received the indicated drug off-label prior to its commercialization. METHODS: We conducted a real-life observational study on three patients from the Severe Asthma Unit of the Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Spain, who received Tezepelumab off-label before its official approval. We analyzed symptoms control based on ACT, exacerbations, reductions in the doses of oral corticosteroid, lung function, blood changes and safety at 3 months of treatment. RESULTS: Tezepelumab demonstrated efficacy in improving asthma control and a notable reduction in emergency department visits. OCS use decreased, with one patient halving their prednisone dose. Lung function, particularly FEV1 and FEV1/FVC parameters, improved, but no significant changes were observed in FeNO levels, blood eosinophil counts and total IgE. The treatment exhibited a favorable safety profile with no reported adverse effects during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary real-world experience prior to the official approval of tezepelumab in Spain, this monoclonal antibody showed promising results and suggests its potential as a valuable alternative for the treatment of severe asthma.

Changes in disease burden and treatment reality in patients with severe asthma.

BACKGROUND: Biologics are clinically available for patients with severe asthma, but changes in asthma control over time are unknown. We examined changes in disease burden and treatment in severe asthma patients. METHODS: This retrospective study used a Japanese health insurance database (Cross Fact) and included patients aged ≥16 years treated continuously with an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) for a diagnosis of asthma in each calendar year from 2015 to 2019. Severe asthma was defined as annual use of high-dose ICS plus one or more asthma controller medications four or more times, oral corticosteroids for ≥183 days, or biologics for ≥16 weeks. Changes in asthma exacerbations, prescriptions, and laboratory testing were examined. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics were similar throughout the study. The number and proportion of patients with severe asthma among those with asthma increased (2724; 15.3% in 2015 vs 4485; 19.0% in 2019). The proportion of severe asthma patients with two or more asthma exacerbations decreased from 24.4% to 21.5%. Odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of ≥2 asthma exacerbations in each year compared with 2015 were 0.96 (0.85-1.08) in 2016 and 0.86 (0.76-0.97) in 2017, with significant reductions observed in subsequent years. Short-acting beta agonists and oral corticosteroid prescriptions for asthma exacerbations decreased and long-acting muscarinic antagonist and biologic prescriptions for maintenance treatment increased. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed improvements in disease burden and treatment in severe asthma patients. There remains an unmet medical need for patients with severe asthma, given the proportion who continue to have asthma exacerbations.

Remission in asthma.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the current concepts of remission in asthma. RECENT FINDINGS: Until 2023, asthma guidelines have been promoting the concept of disease control, recommending the step-wise addition of drugs until the best possible disease control is achieved. With the advent of highly effective, anti-inflammatory disease-modifying antiasthmatic drugs (DMAADs), treatment goals of asthma have changed. Several national guidelines have now announced remission as a general treatment goal in asthma. Currently, all guidelines agree that asthma remission is defined by the presence of at least three characteristics over a period of at least one 1 year: absence of exacerbations, no systemic corticosteroid use for the treatment of asthma and minimal asthma-related symptoms. In the future, a generally accepted, evidence-based and easy-to-use definition of remission will be needed for daily clinical practice. It is clear, however, that precise phenotyping (including measurement of biomarkers) is an essential prerequisite to achieve clinical remission in each individual patient. SUMMARY: Remission has been included as the treatment goal in asthma in several national guidelines, reflecting the paradigm shift in asthma, from short-term symptom control to long-term symptom prevention. An international consensus on the criteria for asthma remission is expected in the near future.

[Precision medicine in the diagnosis and treatment of asthma]. / Präzisionsmedizin in der Diagnostik und Therapie von Asthma.

Due to the availability of disease-modifying anti-asthmatic drugs (DMAADs), especially inhaled steroids (alone or in combination with long-acting bronchodilators), biologics and modern allergen immunotherapy, the treatment of asthma has fundamentally changed. The aims of modern asthma precision medicine are prevention of symptoms and the induction and maintenance of asthma remission (long-term asthma control, freedom from exacerbations and stable lung function without the use of systemic steroids). A treat to target approach is used as for other chronic inflammatory diseases in internal medicine: the aim is to achieve remission by an individually tailored treatment with DMAADs; however, the prerequisite for modern asthma precision medicine is asthma phenotyping, including a detailed medical history, lung function testing, allergological diagnostics and measurement of type 2 markers (blood eosinophils and, if available, exhaled nitric oxide, FeNO).

Identification and treatment of persistent small airway dysfunction in paediatric patients with asthma: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a common respiratory disease. In asthma, the small airways have more intensive inflammation and prominent airway remodelling, compared to the central airways. We aimed to investigate the predictive value of risk factors and the fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) for persistent small airway dysfunction (p-SAD), and compare the effects of different treatment modalities. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 248 children with asthma (aged 4-11 years). Binary logistic regression was used to analyse the risk factors for p-SAD. Correlations among FEV1/FVC, small airway function parameters, and FeNO levels in patients with asthma were analysed using Spearman's rank correlation. The receiver operating characteristic curve and the Delong test were used to analyse the predictive value of FeNO for p-SAD. Differences in the treatment effects of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and ICS with a long-acting beta-agonist (ICS/LABA) on p-SAD were analysed using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Asthmatic children with older age of receiving the regular treatment (OR 1.782, 95% CI 1.082-2.935), with younger age at the time of onset of suspected asthma symptoms (OR 0.602, 95% CI 0.365-0.993), with longer duration of using ICS or ICS/LABA (OR 1.642, 95% CI 1.170-2.305) and with worse asthma control (OR 3.893, 95% CI 1.699-8.922) had increased risk for p-SAD. Significant negative correlations of small airway function parameters with FeNO at a 200 mL/s flow rate (FeNO200), and the concentration of nitric oxide in the alveolar or acinar region (CaNO) were observed. The areas under the curve of FeNO200 (cut-off:10.5ppb), CaNO (cut-off:5.1ppb), and FeNO200 combined with CaNO were 0.743, 0.697, and 0.750, respectively, for asthma with p-SAD. After using ICS or ICS/LABA, switching to ICS/LABA was easier than continuing with ICS to improve small airway dysfunction (SAD) in the 8th month. CONCLUSIONS: Paediatric asthma with p-SAD is associated with older age at receiving regular treatment, younger age at the time of onset of suspected asthma symptoms, longer duration of using ICS or ICS/LABA, worse asthma control, and higher FeNO200 and CaNO levels, all of which can be combined with small airway function indicators to distinguish p-SAD from asthma. ICS/LABA improves SAD better than ICS alone.

Adverse events of anti-IL-5 drugs in patients with eosinophilic asthma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and real-world evidence-based assessments.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to clarify comprehensively the safety profiles of anti-IL-5 drugs and pinpoint potential safety concerns that may arise in their post-marketing phase. METHODS: Two researchers conducted comprehensive searches of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to September 2022. Additionally, we investigated the FDA AE Reporting System for post-marketing adverse event (AE) reports related to anti-IL-5 drugs. The outcomes fulfilled the proportional reporting rate criteria and the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network. RESULTS: We included 24 published studies in our analysis. The anti-IL-5 treatment group showed an incidence of AEs comparable to the placebo group, and it exhibited a significantly lower frequency of serious AEs. Common AEs were asthma, nasopharyngitis, headache, upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), and bronchitis. The post-marketing data included 28,478 case reports associated with the suspect drugs and 75 suspect safety observations affecting 16 system organ classes. New suspect observations included incomplete therapeutic product effect, URTIs, and pulmonary mass in reports related to mepolizumab. Reports associated with mepolizumab and benralizumab also indicated issues with incorrect technique in device usage and product issues. CONCLUSIONS: Individual anti-IL-5 drugs' safety profiles largely matched their product inserts. We identified issues like improper device usage, product issue, and URTIs as potential concerns for mepolizumab and benralizumab. Additionally, all anti-IL-5 drugs showed signs of incomplete therapeutic effects.

Clinical characteristics of complete responders versus non-complete responders to omalizumab, benralizumab and mepolizumab in patients with severe asthma: a long-term retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Some patients with severe asthma may benefit from treatment with biologics, but evidence has been mostly collected from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), in which patients' characteristics are different from those encountered in asthma patients in the real-world setting. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical features of complete responders versus non-complete responders to long-term treatment with biologics in patients with severe asthma attended in routine daily practice. METHODS: Data of a cohort of 90 patients with severe asthma who were treated with biologics (omalizumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab) for at least 12 months and were followed up to March 2022. Data recorded included clinical characteristics and effectiveness of treatment (exacerbation, Asthma Control Test [ACT] score, lung function, use of maintenance oral corticosteroids [mOCS]), FeNO, and blood eosinophils at baseline, at 12 months, and at the end of follow-up. Complete response is considered if, in addition to not presenting exacerbations or the use of mOCS, the ACT score was >20 and, the FEV1 >80% predicted. RESULTS: An improvement in all asthma control parameters was observed after 12 months of treatment and a mean follow-up of 55 months. After 12 months of treatment 27.2% of patients met the criteria of complete response and this percentage even increased to 35.3% at the end of follow-up. Long-term complete response was associated to better lung function with mepolizumab and omalizumab treatment and to less previous exacerbations in the benralizumab group. The main cause of not achieving a complete response was the persistence of an airflow obstructive pattern. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that omalizumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab improved the clinical outcomes of patients with severe asthma in a clinic environment with similar effect sizes to RCTs in the long term follow-up. Airflow obstruction, however, was a predictor of a non-complete response to biologics.

Treatment with anti-IgE and anti-IL-5 biologics significantly improved clinical outcomes in severe asthma patients.The rate of complete responders of 27.2% at 12 months even increased to 35.3% at the end of a mean follow-up of 55 months.The persistence of an airflow obstructive pattern was the main cause of the failure to achieve complete response.